First does H, hydrogen or oxygen alone carry more PE, potential energy or these aforementioned with other variants, covariants, derivatives and protagonists that is with these elements alone or with the mentioned concept with these elements does it apply to molecules, substances and compounds altogether keeping in mind a use of life that has an output of use that does not cause radiation that of radioactive decay rather minimally heat or water vapor heat or straight non air born carbon rather carbon for soil or if it is airborne carbon a method is introduced to filter the particles like in methane treatments. My main question is do you start at the element or the structures that are constructed of the element? A good example is y = x which can be thought of as H, hydrogen with is properties or you can have y = (x2)+9 which is more complex like H2O. ---The question is as you make a equation of elements or regular equation more expressive, when does it provide optimum output? I think it lies in working backwards with the elements with the most stability and pe, potential energy, consequently, hoping stability denotes less radioactivity. But aren't there ways to cancel properties of decay with, not too clear on this, but other types of isotopes and it's scalars, drop a question or hint if you have something to add as of yet no visitor has, thus seemingly might be lacking triviality? The trick here is also like mentioned variants of stable elements just like a person is a person of people and one can be a jerk and one not. There are also variants of hydrogen, this lies in the quantified changes in the quantum structure for example pure hydrogen and H from a cloud versus the ocean. More or less contaminants and origin.
